The analysis indicated that the partnership between the linear combinations out-of both groups of variables you will top feel explained because of the one function with a Rc property value
To your PSPP, four activities came up, identified as actual self-worthy of, sporting events skills, physical condition, real fuel, and telegraph dating nedir you will glamorous muscles with eigenvalues of just one.78, 4.34, 3.59, step three.46, and you can six.08 correspondingly bookkeeping to have 64% of your own variance one of the situations. Compared to the advised hierarchical design (Fox Corbin, 1989), yet not, brand new real mind-worthy of size while the glamorous human anatomy subscale shown significant basis convergence and you will was after that deleted away from after that analysis. It basis convergence between the attractive body and physical care about-worth scales might have been said someplace else (Sonstroem ainsi que al., 1992). The remainder about three subscales away from real mind-perceptions accounted for 38% of one’s variation on survey points. Cronbach (1951) alphas for these subscales had been .ninety to possess sporting events proficiency (6 situations), .86 to possess physical condition (six products), and .85 having bodily power (six facts).
New POSQ also presented a definite basis framework getting interpretation. A couple of items emerged having eigenvalues greater than step one.00 and was basically recognized as activity (6 products) and you can ego orientation (6 products) to have get it done, bookkeeping getting 34% and you will 21% of your variance during the participants’ answers, correspondingly. The latest interfactor relationship was minimal (r = .04), in line with previous research (Treasure Roberts, 1994; Roberts Benefits 1995) guaranteeing orthogonality of these two items. Leader coefficients had been .71 and you will .90 for the job and you can ego direction having get it done subscales, correspondingly.
So you’re able to view the new multivariate relationships between the linear consolidation of these two sets of parameters composed of bodily mind-perceptions/goal orientations for do it, and you can indicator regarding built-in determination to have get it done, canonical correlation is actually performed
The brand new IMI and showed a steady factor framework given that all of the issues stacked to their particular situations conference minimal requirement as retained to own translation. Eigenvalues had been higher than 1.00 for the attention/exhilaration (5 products), recognized skills (4 situations), effort/advantages (5 affairs), and you may tension/pressure (cuatro items) inherent motivation subscales, correspondingly, bookkeeping to own 60.1% of your variance from the items. Inner reliability coefficients was indeed .82 (interest/enjoyment), .77 (recognized competence), .76 (effort/ importance), and you can .77 (tension/ pressure) toward built-in inspiration having do so subscales.
Setting and simple deviations of the bodily thinking-impact (PSPP), task and ego orientations getting exercise (POSQ), and built-in determination to own get it done (IMI) subscales is exhibited when you look at the Dining table step 1. Significant zero order correlations (2-tailed) was in fact noticed between task positioning to own take action and you will each other notice/excitement (r .29), and effort/advantages (roentgen = .36). Self-perceptions regarding health was in fact relevant so you can interest/thrills (roentgen = .49), identified competence (r .59), effort/characteristics (roentgen = .49), and you can stress/stress (roentgen = -.27).
The latest predictor variables had been consisting of mind-attitudes regarding football competence, health, and you may bodily electricity, as well as activity and you may ego orientations to have exercise. The latest standard details contained the fresh four actions of built-in determination to possess do it, particularly, interest/pleasure, observed ability, effort/pros, and stress/pressure.
74, F(4, 252) = ,p <.0001). Follow-up canonical correlation analysis indicated three significant functions emerged. However, only the first function exceeded the .30 criterion (10% of the variance) suggested as the minimal level for meaningful interpretation (Tabachnick Fidell, 1989). 68 ([R.sup.2]= .46). A minimal canonical loading of .30 is considered to contribute significantly to the multivariate relationship (Pedhazur, 1982). As Table 2 demonstrates, a high positive loading on physical condition, and moderately positive loadings on task orientation for exercise, sports competence, and physical strength, were positively associated to the criterion set of variables composed of interest/ enjoyment, perceived competence, and effort/importance, and were negatively relat ed to tension/pressure for exercise. Ego orientation for exercise, however, failed to significantly contribute to the multivariate relationship. The redundancy index revealed that 16% of the variance in the four indices of intrinsic motivation for exercise could be explained by the linear combination of the predictor variables. A redundancy value of 10% is recommended as a significant and meaningful cutoff for interpretation (Pedhazur, 1982).